Poverty Alleviation Policy Strategy Through Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs) and Indonesia's Economic Resources
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62503/gr.v1i1.6Keywords:
Sustainable Development Goals, Social Welfare, Policy, Macroeconomics, Palembang CityAbstract
The purpose of this research is to examine and provide guidelines for local governments, communities, academics, and the private sector in planning and implementing poverty alleviation activities that are more effective, efficient, and on target. In addition, the specific objectives of this study are: 1) increasing the rate of regional economic growth through optimizing potential sources of regional income, 2) increasing per capita income, and 3) reducing poverty, unemployment, and socioeconomic inequality of the community. The research was conducted in Palembang City, South Sumatra, Indonesia, in the last 10 years, namely 2017-2022. The research approach uses qualitative descriptive analysis. Data sources include secondary data and Regional Statistics. The results of this study are based on the Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs) indicators, there are four priority scales in poverty alleviation, namely, Health and Infrastructure (Priority I), Education (Priority II), Food Stability (Priority III), and Population and Employment (Priority IV). Therefore, as a solution to poverty alleviation strategies, a budget approach through optimizing the regional economy and regional sources of income as well as community empowerment factors is important. In addition, involvement between elements (government, organizations, communities, universities, and institutions) is expected to continue as an effort to realize poverty alleviation can be overcome optimally.
References
Andrew Holden. (2011). Tourism, Poverty and Development: Vol. volume 3.
Anyon, J. (2017). What "counts" as educational policy? Notes toward a new paradigm. Exploring Education: An Introduction to the Foundations of Education, 75(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315408545-4
Ariyani, N., Fauzi, A., Juanda, B., & Beik, I. S. (2016). A policy scenario modeling of poverty alleviation program in Indonesia : An application of Promethee method. Issues in Business Management and Economics, 4(6), 53–62.
Awumbila, M., Owusu, G., & Teye, J. K. (2014). Can rural-urban migration into slums reduce poverty? Evidence from Ghana. Migrating Out of Poverty, 1(4), 1–41. http://migratingoutofpoverty.org
Central Bureau of Statistics of South Sumatra Province. (2020). South Sumatra Province in 2020 Figures. In sumsel.bps.go.id.
Barrett, Christopher, B., & Carter, Michael, R. (2012). The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty - poverty and empirical implications. Cornell University .
Blustein, D. L., & Guarino, P. A. (2020). Work and Unemployment in the Time of COVID-19: The Existential Experience of Loss and Fear. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 60(5), 702–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167820934229
BPS Indonesia. (2023). Statistik Indonesia 2023. [Documnet] avaiable at https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2023/02/28/18018f9896f09f03580a614b/statistik-indonesia-2023.html accessed on November 2023
Bridge the What Is. (n.d.).
Buheji, M. (2019). Shaping Future Type of Poverty-The Foresight of Future Socio-economic Problems & Solutions-Taking Poverty as a Context-Beyond 2030. American Journal of Economics, 2019(3), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.economics.20190903.03
Buheji, M., da Costa Cunha, K., Beka, G., Mavrić, B., Leandro do Carmo de Souza, Y., Souza da Costa Silva, S., Hanafi, M., & Chetia Yein, T. (2020). The Extent of COVID-19 Pandemic Socio-Economic Impact on Global Poverty. A Global Integrative Multidisciplinary Review. American Journal of Economics, 10(4), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.economics.20201004.02
cecilia tacoli. (2012). UNITED NATIONS POPULATION FUND URBANIZATION AND EMERGING POPULATION ISSUES Urbanization , gender and urban poverty : paid work and unpaid carework in the city. In Africa (Issue March).
Cobbinah, P. B., & Amoako, C. (2012). Urban sprawl and the loss of peri-urban land in Kumasi, Ghana. International Journal of Social and Human Sciences, 6(1), 388–397. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/232957200_Urban_Sprawl_and_the_Loss_of_Peri_Urban_Land_in_Kumasi_Ghana/file/d912f509af6f7c7ef5.pdf
Deffrinica, D., & Tjondro Sugianto, H. A. (2022). Regional Economic Development Planning Strategies in Poverty. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.25-11-2021.2319352
Haberman, M. (2010). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(2), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200223
Hatta, Z. A., & Ali, I. (2013). Poverty Reduction Policies in Malaysia: Trends, Strategies and Challenges. Asian Culture and History, 5(2), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.5539/ach.v5n2p48
Head, B. W. (2023). Wicked Problems in Public Policy. Encyclopedia of Public Policy, 3(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90434-0_43-1
Hernandez, D. J. (2011). Double jeopardy: How third grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. Annie E. Casey Foundation, 1–15.
Hupe, P., & Buffat, A. (2014). A Public Service Gap: Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 16(4), 548–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.854401
Jenkins, P., & Johnson, J. M. (1992). Praise for "True Detectives." The American Journal of Nursing, 92(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.2307/3426813
Kakwani, N., & Silber, J. (2008). The many dimensions of poverty. In The Many Dimensions of Poverty. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592407
Laborde, D., Martin, W., & Vos, R. (2021). Impacts of COVID-19 on global poverty, food security, and diets: Insights from global model scenario analysis. Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom), 52(3), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12624
Laurens, S., & Perdana Kusuma Putra, A. H. (2020). Poverty alleviation efforts through MDG's and economic resources in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(9), 755–767. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO9.755
Mousseau, M. (2011). Urban poverty and support for Islamist terror: Survey results of Muslims in fourteen countries. Journal of Peace Research, 48(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343310391724
Sandel, M. J. (n.d.). Sandel_Winners_and_Losers.
Shandmi, E., Hanvoravongchai, P., Obando, C., Petrosyan, V., Rao, K. D., Ruano, A. L., Shi, L., Souza, L. E. de, Spitzer-Shohat, S., Sturgiss, E., Suphanchaimat, R., Uribe, M. V., & Willems, S. (2020). Health equity and COVID-19: global perspectives. International Journal for Equity in Health, 19(104), 1–16.
Spicker, P., Leguizamon, S. A., & Gordon, D. (2007). Poverty: An International Glossary Studies in Poverty Research. Zed Books.
Tania, M., Tania, M., & Li, T. M. (2011). Centering labor in the land grab debate How to cite TSpace items Centering labor in the land grab debate.
The World Bank. (2017). Accelerating Uganda’s Development: Ending Child Marriage, Educating Girls. The World Bank, 76. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/336651528202351101/pdf/Accelerating-Ugandas-Development-Ending-Child-Marriage-and-Educating-Girls.pdf
Vindrola-Padros, C., Chisnall, G., Cooper, S., Dowrick, A., Djellouli, N., Symmons, S. M., Martin, S., Singleton, G., Vanderslott, S., Vera, N., & Johnson, G. A. (2020). Carrying Out Rapid Qualitative Research During a Pandemic: Emerging Lessons From COVID-19. Qualitative Health Research, 30(14), 2192–2204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320951526
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Government & Resilience
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Licence
Use of articles will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license as currently displayed on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third-party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The spirit of Government & Resilience is to disseminate articles published as freely as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Government & Resilience permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and Government & Resilience for distributing works in journals and other media of publication.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:
1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
2. The right to use the substance of the article in future works, including lectures and books,
3. The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
4. The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Government & Resilience).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he or she has been authorized by all co-authors to agree on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf and agrees to inform his or her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Government & Resilience will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. Government & Resilience will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open-access journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, the author(s) are aware that Government & Resilience entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
