Female Legislators and Social Inclusion: Representing the Unheard for Resilient Communities in Majalengka Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62503/gr.v4i2.96Keywords:
Women's Political Representation, Social Inclusion, Resilient Communities, Local politicsAbstract
Majalengka Regency constitutes a particularly relevant case for this study because it reflects the gap between descriptive representation and substantive representation. Despite the existence of female legislators and various local policies aimed at protecting women and children, cases of violence against these groups remain significant, while women occupy only 12 percent of seats in the local parliament. This combination makes Majalengka an appropriate setting for examining the extent to which female legislators can influence policy agendas and advocate for women’s and children’s rights within a male-dominated local political structure. The study used a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data were obtained through semi-structured interviews, observations, and documentation studies, then analyzed using Hanna Pitkin's theory of political representation. The results show that female legislators play a role in bringing women's perspectives into the political process and strengthening the legitimacy of women's and children's issues on the regional policy agenda. However, their influence on policy priorities and resource allocation is still limited by a patriarchal culture, male political dominance, unequal distribution of strategic positions, and limited political resources. This research contributes to the development of studies on women's political representation by showing the gap between representation and influence (representation–influence gap), so that the quality of representation is not only measured by the number of women in parliament, but also by their capacity to influence public policy.
References
Abels, G., & Mushaben, J. M. (2020). Great expectations, structural limitations: Ursula von der Leyen and the Commission’s new equality agenda. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(S1), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13102
Adi Muliana, I. K. (2024). Legislative and judicial dynamics of setting the quota for women’s representation in Parliament in the 2024 General Elections. Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum, 4(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v4i1.46691
Akbar, H., Al-Dajani, H., Ayub, N., & Adeinat, I. (2023). Women’s leadership gamut in Saudi Arabia’s higher education sector. Gender, Work & Organization, 30(5), 1649–1675. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13003
Antaranews. (2024). KPU Majalengka sediakan 51.420 lembar surat suara cadangan pilkada. https://jabar.antaranews.com/berita/555789/kpu-majalengka-sediakan-51420-lembar-surat-suara-cadangan-pilkada
Anumo, F. G., & Pacificah, F. O. (2019). The influence of gender quotas on women’s participation in legislative processes in the National Assembly of the 11th Parliament of Kenya (2013–2017). International Journal of Current Aspects, 3(II), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.35942/ijcab.v3iII.22
Bäck, H., & Debus, M. (2019). When do women speak? A comparative analysis of the role of gender in legislative debates. Political Studies, 67(3), 576–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718789358
Badal, A. (2025). Why do post-civil war countries fast-track gender quotas? The case of Nepal. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 60(1), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096231168061
Báez Carlos, A. (2022). Avanza el modelo de democracia paritaria en México. Revista Mexicana de Análisis Político y Administración Pública, 10(20), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.15174/remap.v10i20.369
Bjarnegård, E., & Zetterberg, P. (2022). How autocrats weaponize women’s rights. Journal of Democracy, 33(2), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2022.0018
Clayton, A. (2021). How do electoral gender quotas affect policy? Annual Review of Political Science, 24(1), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102019
Folke, O., Rickne, J., & Smith, D. M. (2021). Gender and dynastic political selection. Comparative Political Studies, 54(2), 339–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020938089
Gilas, K. M. (2022). ¿Cómo evaluar la representación simbólica de género? Revista Elecciones, 21(23), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.53557/Elecciones.2022.v21n23.07
Greene, Z., & O’Brien, D. Z. (2016). Diverse parties, diverse agendas? Female politicians and the parliamentary party’s role in platform formation. European Journal of Political Research, 55(3), 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12141
Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2025a). Sexism, harassment and violence against women in parliaments: Asia-Pacific regional report 2025. https://www.ipu.org
Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2025b). Women in parliament in 2024: The year in review. https://www.ipu.org
Irawan, F., Prasetyo, N. D., & Al-Uyun, D. (2023). Women’s representation in the nomination of legislative members according to Law Number 7 of 2017 on Elections. International Journal of Educational Review, Law and Social Sciences (IJERLAS), 3(4), 1319–1328. https://doi.org/10.54443/ijerlas.v3i4.986
Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2019). Populism and feminist politics: The cases of Finland and Spain. European Journal of Political Research, 58(4), 1108–1128. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12333
Martínez-Córdoba, P., Benito, B., & García-Sánchez, I. (2023). Women’s management in local government: The effects of substantive representation on welfare service efficiency. Social Policy & Administration, 57(3), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12853
Martínez-Gómez, M., Bustamante, E., & Berna-Escriche, C. (2022). Development and validation of an e-learning education model in the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study in secondary education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(20), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013261
Mechkova, V., & Edgell, A. B. (2024). Substantive representation, women’s health, and regime type. Comparative Political Studies, 57(14), 2449–2481. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140231204222
Miller, C. M. (2023). Between Westminster and Brussels: Putting the “Parliament” in parliamentary ethnography. Politics & Gender, 19(2), 533–559. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X22000071
Miranda-Leibe, L., Roque, B., & Eyzagure, M. (2022). Discursos sexistas acerca de los intereses de las mujeres en el parlamento chileno: Un desafío pendiente para la representación descriptiva y sustantiva de género. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago). Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-090x2022005000122
Miruka, S., Ngare, G., & Okemwa, P. (2021). Elusive quest by women for legislative numbers in Kenya’s National Assembly of the 11th Parliament (2013–2017). International Journal of Gender Studies, 6(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.47604/ijgs.1279
Numajalengka. (2024). Paradoks Pilkada Majalengka: Problem logistik dan partisipasi pemilih. http://www.numajalengka.or.id/
O’Brien, D. Z., & Rickne, J. (2016). Gender quotas and women’s political leadership. American Political Science Review, 110(1), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055415000611
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
Pramudita, T., & Lestari, Y. (2023). Peran legislator perempuan dalam revisi Perda tentang Penyelenggaraan Perlindungan Anak di DPRD Surabaya. Jurnal Inovasi: Administrasi Negara Terapan, 1(1).
Prodip, M. A. (2022). Cultural obstacles to women’s political empowerment in India and Bangladesh: A comparative perspective. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(3), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891121990742
Putra, W. (2024, 17 Januari). Kata pakar politik Unpad soal mundurnya ratusan kader PDIP Majalengka. detikJabar. https://www.detik.com/jabar/berita/d-7146505/kata-pakar-politik-unpad-soal-mundurnya-ratusan-kader-pdip-majalengka
Ramadhan, F. A. (2024). Strategi keterwakilan perempuan di legislatif dalam menunjang program pemberdayaan perempuan di Kota Bengkulu [Skripsi, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri]. IPDN e-Prints. https://eprints.ipdn.ac.id/18978/
Rosieana, M. (2013). Keterwakilan perempuan dalam lembaga legislatif Kabupaten Malinau: Studi pada anggota DPRD Kabupaten Malinau. eJournal Pemerintahan Integratif, 1(1).
Samsa, A. (2020). Strategi politik identitas perempuan dalam Pemilihan Umum Legislatif 2019 (Studi tentang kemenangan Ade Kartika di Daerah Pemilihan II Kabupaten Majalengka). ARISTO: Jurnal Sosial, Politik, Humaniora, 9(1), 162–186. https://doi.org/10.24269/ars.v9i1.2009
Sari, A. D., Octaviana, A., Kamila, D. C., Permatasari, N. P., Irawan, T. F. P., & Hadji, K. (2025). Peran perempuan dalam masyarakat terhadap penempatan anggota legislatif di Komisi DPR RI periode 2019–2024. JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum, 6(1), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i01.930
Syaripudin, D. (2025). Pendidikan pemilih untuk penyandang disabilitas pasca-Pemilu 2024: Meningkatkan inklusi demokrasi di Kabupaten Majalengka. KPU Kabupaten Majalengka. https://kab-majalengka.kpu.go.id/blog/read/8003_pendidikan-pemilih-untuk-penyandang-disabilitas-pasca-pemilu-2024-meningkatkan-inklusi-demokrasi-di-kabupaten-majalengka
Tambe, E. B., & Jormfeldt, J. (2025). Addressing the gender gap: Impact of institutions on women’s political participation in Africa. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 66(2), 140–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152241253206
Tias, R. N., Nisrina, A. D., Destriputra, N., Putra, F. A. A., & Prakoso, S. G. (2023). Tantangan kebijakan affirmative action sebagai upaya penguatan keterwakilan perempuan di legislatif. Jurnal Politica Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri dan Hubungan Internasional, 14(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.22212/jp.v14i2.4151
Tula, M. I. (2023). Recorrido histórico-político de la participación de mujeres en Argentina: Continuidades y desafíos. Papeles del Centro, 17(27), e0035. https://doi.org/10.14409/pc.2023.27.e0035
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Afni Nurul Adilah, Mudiyati Rahmatunnisa, Ari Ganjar Herdiansah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Government & Resilience (G&R) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license.
Under this license, authors retain the copyright to their work while granting Government & Resilience (G&R) the non-exclusive right to publish, distribute, and identify itself as the original publisher of the article.
The CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license permits anyone to copy, distribute, display, perform, and adapt the published work for non-commercial purposes, provided that:
- appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the journal;
- a link to the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license is provided;
- any changes made are clearly indicated; and
- any derivative works are distributed under the same CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
Commercial use of the published material requires prior permission from the copyright holder(s).
Authors are free to deposit the published version of their articles in institutional repositories, personal websites, or other non-commercial platforms, provided that proper acknowledgment is given to the original publication in Government & Resilience (G&R).
A link to the full license text should also be provided: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
